Draft 3 JULY 1996
Draft 4 Mar 1998
DOES THE BODY AFFECT THE MIND?
There is little doubt any longer that the body has a great influence on the mind, and that
participation in sports can affect mood if not behavior.
Berger and Owen (1988) investigated the effects of swimming, body conditioning (weight lifting
and running), hatha yoga (an eastern, non-martial art) and fencing (a non-eastern combat art) on
stress reduction. The components of exercise which were thought to best facilitate psychological
benefits, especially stress reduction, included: 1. an aerobic component, 2. a non-competitive
aspect, (competition was assumed to be inherently stressful) 3. predictable elements, (so that the
exerciser can tune out the environment), and 4. a rhythmical nature (again to encourage the mind
to wander). The last two aspects were thought to provide a "time out", which would, in itself,
reduce stress. For instance, just sitting in a chair and relaxing reduces stress. Anxiety and
depression both decline when the subject is engaged in hobbies and in exercise. In contrast, anger
and fatigue are decreased only with exercise.
Other factors involved in physical activities which reduce stress include: 1. frequency, (benefits
from exercise are usually short term so one must exercise regularly) 2. intensity (moderate, not
mild or intense) and 3. duration (at least 20 to 30 minutes, with 60 being better). The activity
should also be pleasing and enjoyable since one is not likely to exercise if it is distasteful, and
doing something one doesn't like is not usually relaxing.
In the study, no long term effects (from the beginning to the end of a 14 week semester) were noted
but low intensity exercise was found to improve mood during the class, as did high intensity
exercise. Swimming has been associated with short term increases in vigor, and decreases in
confusion, stress and anger. Contrary to expectations, swimming showed little effect on the
subjects in this study, but the authors note that the swimmers were in a good mood before their
exercise period began, thus masking any mood improvements.
Body conditioning exercise served to increase feelings of fatigue, with no other mood effects. The
authors speculate that this may have been due to the stress being intense and not moderate, and the
running being interval training, a series of short, fast runs at 90% of maximal heart rate, rather
than a long slow run (LSR) type. In other tests weight lifting was shown to enhance self concept
and lower stress. Running (LSR) has been well documented as a method of stress relief.
Information on the effects of breath control, and relaxation, especially as practiced in hatha yoga,
is sparce. There are indications that the right and left nasal air passages are linked with right and
left hemisphere activity. Breathing is also used in chronic pain control methods. The study
showed that yoga was from the first class, a good method of reducing stress, so it would seem
that there is no need for long practice of the skills before seeing the benefits. Yoga teaches
breathing awareness, self regulation, conscious relaxation of muscles, and an internal awareness,
skills common to many stress reduction programs. Abdominal breathing has been associated with
regulation of the autonomic nervous system while shallow thoracic breathing is associated with
stress. The researchers assumed that fencing would have no effects at all since it satisfied none
of the main criteria for stress reduction. In fact few effects were seen but students did show more
vigor after their classes.
The authors concluded that exercise which encourages abdominal breathing, is noncompetitive,
predictable, and rhythmical is stress reducing.
THE PSYCHOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF COMBAT ARTS
Kroll (1967) gives 4 possible links between psychology and sport: 1. Personality factors may
cause individuals to select and participate in a sport. People will choose the sports that most
suits their personality. In this case, beginners and advanced students will show similar
personalities.
2. There may be no pattern for entry to a sport but either personality changes or attrition of
non-desirable pattern types means that those with suitable psychologies remain and are
successful. Choosing a sport may be random but the sport may either change your personality, or
only those with suitable personalities will remain after a certain time.
Beginners will not show a similar personality pattern but advanced students will.
3. There may be no connection at all, no discrimination. The choice of a sport is random, and the
sport may not have any effect at all.
Neither beginners nor advanced students will show any pattern in their personalities.
4. Those entering a sport may show a similar pattern but changes and attrition may cause the
pattern to become non-discriminating. People may choose a sport that suits their personality but
changes and dropouts will be random.
In this case, beginners will show a similar pattern of personality but advanced students will not.
Kroll studied collegiate wrestlers who were of superior, excellent or average skill. All wrestlers
were scored on Form A of the Cattell Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF test) which
is based on factor analytic research and purports to measure all the main and separate dimensions
of personality demonstrated as factors capable of differentiating people. The wrestlers were
different from population norms, being more tough minded, self reliant and masculine. In this
study, the wrestlers were not more neurotic as was previously reported. No differences in
personality were found between wrestlers of different skill levels.
THE PYSCHOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF MARTIAL ARTS
Cox (1993) reviews the literature on the martial arts, giving an overview of the personality traits
of martial artists, the role of imagery in training, the biomechanics of karate techniques, fitness
attributes of martial artists, and the application of martial arts training to the physically
challenged, and as clinical aids to therapy. He concludes that the common image of the martial
artist portrayed in the movies does not fit the actual profile. Martial artists do not start their
studies as more aggressive than the average person, and become less so as they continue their
study. They may also become less anxious, more self-confident and have higher self-esteem as a
result of their studies.
Kroll and Carlson (1967) note that combat sports may provide a chance to display prowess or
masculinity, to develop self confidence, release tension and sublimate aggression. Karate is
suggested as having several advantages as a combat physical education system in that a) women
can participate, b) as a method of self-defence karate may be considered superior to amateur
boxing or wrestling, c) karate effectively develops certain muscular strengths and d) the emphasis
on wholesome character attributes and etiquette rituals is desirable in attempts at amoriolation of
asocial tendencies.
The authors studied karate students from several different clubs, defining a senior as having more
than 1 year experience, an intermediate as more than 6 months and a beginner as less than 6
months. The 16 PF test showed no differences between beginners and advanced students, or with
the normal population. Since the researchers used several different clubs and defined seniors as
having one year or more of experience, there may not have been any differences to see due to
their almost uniform inexperience. The wrestlers in Kroll's other study (Kroll 1967) would all
have had many years of training and also showed no differences. If differences are slow in
developing, the wrestlers would show differences (as they did) from the population norm while
the karate students might not.
Frager (1969) analyzed the psychological makeup of the Japanese Samurai for Psychology Today
magazine. His initial case study was Musashi Miyamoto so he presumably meant to analyze the
Samurai class of the Tokugawa era although he also includes examples of training which extended
through the Meiji period and up to the present day.
The Japanese had an interest in the training of the warrior class and approached the problem in an
empirical and practical way, basing their psychology on observable behavior and concrete
achievements in contest and battle. Frager pointed out that the training goals of the martial arts are
slightly different from what most people expect from sports. The aim of training is never mere
technical excellence or efficiency, that is merely a byproduct of the development of perfect form
and concentration. The discipline of the martial arts was so demanding that it reshaped the student
mentally and physically in every action. A man who achieved mastery of an art would show this
in his every action. The idea was to develop concentration, and attention; to control the emotions,
especially fear and anxiety.
The method of training involved little stress on intellectual explanation, direct experience was
most important. Teachers showed students the value of self control directly, they didn't just talk
about it. Mental development was highly valued, especially over mere technical skill. The
teachers deliberately set out to improve physical skills through mental discipline by developing
the powers of attention and concentration, and by eliminating the fear and nervousness which will
inhibit performance. Frager notes that fear and anxiety, in small amounts may increase
performance, but in larger doses will make it much more difficult to distinguish danger from
trivia. Fear also causes greater rigidity in the response pattern which becomes more stereotyped
and habitual. Reducing fear involves eliminating the fear of dying, and making a calm mind by
creating a balanced and relaxed body. Learning to work with the hara, the lower abdomen, which
is also the physical centre of balance is critical to this.
The mental abilities to be developed included vigilance, a response to certain classes of stimulus,
and concentration, the ability to exclude irrelevant stimuli. Concentration is contrasted to
absorption which occurs when the mind is passive, and caught up by the object. When the mind is
absorbed, important stimuli are missed. This concept is what the priest Takuan Soho (1988)
called fushin or "frozen mind", the condition where the mind is dragged around by the object of
attention. When it is concentrated, the mind is actively directed at the object. It is like a mirror,
reflecting just what is there. Takuan called this fudoshin or "immovable mind", the state where
the object of attention cannot move the mind. Frager states that this mastery of the self through
martial arts inevitably transcends the art and moves into all aspects of life.
Pyecha (1970) set up an experiment that studied subjects over a period of time. While the
potential was there, this experiment was not reported as a longitudinal study. Instead, Pyecha
compared two periods of Physical Education courses to two consecutive 8 week periods of Judo
training. Control I was 8 weeks of handball followed by 8 weeks of volleyball. Control II was 8
weeks of badminton followed by 8 weeks of basketball. Form A of the Cattell 16PF test was
administered pretreatment, at 8 weeks and at 16 weeks. The study was done on a random sample
of male freshmen, who were nonvarsity athletes. All classes were taught by Pyecha, twice a week
in two 8-week sets.
The control groups did not differ one from the other, and showed parallel changes in personality
factors over time at both 8 weeks and at 16 weeks. Eight weeks of handball had the same effects
as 8 weeks of badminton and 8 weeks of volleyball following 8 weeks of handball showed the
same effects as 8 weeks of basketball following 8 weeks of badminton.
When the first Judo class was compared to 8 weeks of badminton and 8 weeks of handball, the
Judo class showed a different set of personality changes. Judo I was higher than the controls on
factor A. The Judo students were more sociable, good natured, easygoing, cooperative, attentive,
softhearted, kindly, trustful, adaptable and warmhearted. A lower score on factor A implies a
personality more aggressive, grasping, critical, obstructive, cool, aloof, hard, precise,
suspicious, rigid and cold.
When the personality changes after the second set of Judo classes was compared to the 16 week
scores of the controls, no differences were seen. Two 8 week sessions of Judo had the same
effect on the students as did 8 weeks of volleyball following 8 weeks of handball or 8 weeks of
basketball following 8 weeks of badminton.
Just what mechanism was involved in changing the personality of the Judo students in a different
way than that of the control students during period I, is not suggested by Pyecha, who, in the
introduction, notes the acclaim the Japanese have for Judo's significant contribution to personality
and character development. Pyecha also does not attempt to explain why there was no difference
between students of the control groups and the Judo students after 16 weeks either. Judo is an
individual sport, as are handball and badminton, the period I controls, while volleyball and
basketball, the period II controls, are team sports. If we suppose that some aspect of Judo itself,
or of the way it is taught, may operate on students in the same manner as does a team sport, then
the results could be explained. A difference in factor A is seen when comparing Judo to
individual sports such as handball and badminton but this difference is eliminated after the control
students participate in 8 weeks of a team sport. It remains to be shown how Judo is similar to a
team sport and how it is different from an individual sport. Duthie et al. (1978) suggest that the
close physical contact involved in Judo might explain the differences between it and the relatively
non-contact control sports.
Greene and others (1974) used the Hand test, a measurement scale developed by one of the
authors, to evaluate intermediate Moo Duck Kwan (Tang Soo Do) Korean Karate students and on
controls in other phys-ed classes. There were no differences on 21 of 24 scales. The karate
students differed on "facade self", the basic reality contact or the basic defence and coping
mechanisms for dealing with the world. This facade self contrasts with the introspective self, a
system that comprises the individual's recognition of his behavior, fantasies and ideals.
According to one of the authors, personality operates through these two "faces" with the
introspective self evaluating and correcting the facade self. The non-karate group showed higher
scores on affection, dependancy and total number of responses (which is said to indicate a better
psychological responsiveness to outside stimuli, a better reserve of potential responses). Karate
students were more constricted and inflexible, less affiliative and deferential.
Interpersonal aggression was equal for both groups, as was the mean need to dominate and control
others. Karate students showed less desire to associate with others for pleasurable experiences.
The authors suggested that Karate students may picture the world as an unfriendly place and tend
to back off.
In a study of this type, it is difficult to say whether the karate students exhibited this personality
type before joining the class, or whether they developed it as a result of participating in the class.
The authors suggest that individuals may turn to karate not just to obtain physical exercise, but
because of definable psychological needs and attitudes.
Duthie and others (1978) examined two groups of karate students. One which was defined as
superior, members being listed in a Who's Who of martial arts, was much older and more
experienced than an average group consisting of two karate clubs. Duthie noted that earlier studies
showed no differences between groups of martial artists but did show differences with the general
population. This might suggest that there is a self-selection to join the martial arts and Duthie
wished to test this.
These researchers used the Adjective Checklist, a 300 word list that subjects check off, to
measure personality, and a Martial Arts Questionnaire of their own design to gather background
information on martial art style, expertise and attitude. On examination, the superior group was
found to be higher than the average karate group on: defensiveness, self confidence, achievement,
dominance, endurance, affiliation, heterosexuality, exhibition, autonomy and number of
favourable adjectives checked. They scored lower on: succorance, abasement and counseling
readiness. This implied that the advanced karate group were outgoing extroverts somewhat aware
of the social environment who look at their selves positively and are trying to get ahead in life.
The difference between the two groups might suggest that training causes changes in personality,
even if the students were originally self-selected to join. An alternative explanation might be that
the superior group displayed precisely those personality traits that, had they owned them when
they began their training, would result in their advancing and eventually rising to the top of their
chosen field. In this case, those superior people measured were simply those who, due to their
personalities, were followed by others less disposed to leadership roles. In a longitudinal study
it would be possible to measure individuals at the beginning and at the end of a training period,
eliminating these problems of both prior selection to join, and of the differential advancement of
certain personalities.
Konzak and Boudreau (1984) studied male and female, university aged, traditional karate
students. This was a cross sectional study with respect to belt level. The students were separated
into three groups; beginner, (2 weeks training) intermediate (6 months and at least green belt
level) and advanced (black belt, with at least 3 1/2 years training)
The authors point out that mental health is not just the absence of illness, but is an overall sense of
wellness, in body and mind. Much of the recent self help and human growth interest concentrates
on Eastern approaches which recognize this idea. The underlying reality of Karate is explained as
self discipline, self awareness, control, mind-body harmony, mental strength and relaxation, and
personal development. The training is designed to improve mental discipline, concentration,
relaxation, self awareness and the feeling of personal competence, it is not mainly about physical
skills. There are several ways of looking at martial arts, as an art form (giving grace and inner
expression), as meditation, as a competitive non-contact sport, or as kick boxing. Konzak and
Boudreau separate the arts into two general classes. Traditional training focuses on the
art/meditative aspects while "modern" training concentrates on the sport/competitive aspect.
Traditional training gives little time to tournament competition, stressing mainly mental
discipline, character and physical skills.
The authors used Cattell's 16PF test and performed a preliminary analysis of characteristics for
male and female students. The majority (40 of 42) of female students fit the "female profile" and
had a feminine gender identification while the majority (34 of 42) of male students had a male
gender identification. This same analysis was carried out on the separate beginner, intermediate
and advanced students showing that 83% of male beginners were most similar to the other
beginners, while 81% of female beginners were also most similar to other beginners. 83% of both
male and female intermediate students were most similar to other intermediate students while
100% of advanced students of either sex were most like other advanced students.
Female advanced students differed from both beginners and intermediate females, as well as from
the general female population. They were more intelligent, emotionally stable, assertive, lively,
venturesome, trusting, imaginative, forthright, self-assured, and relaxed than women in the lower
rank groups. Male advanced students were more intelligent, emotionally stable, lively, expedient,
venturesome, tenderminded, imaginative, forthright, self assured, self sufficient and relaxed than
the beginning or intermediate male students or general population males.
Of particular note was that while both advanced males and females differ from less advanced
karate students and from the general population of males and females, they were quite similar to
each other. The differences in gender identity were much less evident in advanced students than in
beginner or intermediate students. Konzak and Boudreau state that "In this sense, the test results
suggest the effects of karate training are not based on a particular sexual stereotype. Strength need
not be machismo; sensitivity need not be weakness. It has been said that the woman who most
needs liberating is the woman in every man and that the man who most needs liberating is the man
in every woman. From these results it would seem that karate training is very effective means to
achieve this form of harmony." (p.4)
It should be of great interest to those dealing with gender issues that martial arts training would
seem to have the potential to create an equality between the sexes, at least with regard to gender
identification within each person. It has often been suggested that a more feminine male would be
more sensitive to women's issues and it would perhaps be reasonable to assume that a more
masculine woman would be more understanding of men. Later in this paper we will discuss the
idea of a physical equality between the sexes when we examine self defence courses.
The Konzak and Boudreau paper is a cross sectional study and therefore the question of self
selection comes up again. If there were true self-selection, with students dropping out to create
the differences in personality factors measured, as opposed to the students actually changing, then
the intermediate level should be a mix of the beginner and the advanced characteristics. In fact the
middle level had its own distinct pattern which was different from that of either beginner or
advanced students. In personal interviews; 93% of the students said that karate had an effect on
their lives beyond the physical. 79% said the training enhanced their sense of general
assertiveness, and the women felt it made them more assertive in their relations with men. Some
students said they were now more aggressive and assertive, while some said they were less
aggressive and had more self control. 21% said they felt there was no change in aggression. The
authors point out that this apparent difference in levels of aggressive feelings may point more to
the various meanings attached to that word than to anything else. Of the students interviewed, only
a small minority reported that they did not feel changed and changed for the better by the classes.
The most discriminating factor in the analysis was the intelligence level, the authors suggested that
this factor probably works through an improved ability to analyze, concentrate and relax, to
improve scores on logistic tests. The class etiquette stressed humility, concentration, respect and
relaxation. Talks on philosophy during class, and group reinforcement of ideals led to a greater
sense of community belonging. It is postulated that a mechanism of high powered resocialization
(brainwashing) is responsible for the changes in the students, the rhythmic breathing during
training inducing what is almost a self hypnosis. The authors caution that with this power to
change, it is important that the teacher be knowledgeable, as a bad instructor might actually cause
damage to the students. Karate training is proposed by these authors as a good self help
mechanism.
Richman and Rehberg (1986) examined self-esteem before a sport karate tournament and the
effect of winning a trophy during the competition. Students were grouped into beginner,
intermediate, advanced, and expert groups. The Rosenberg self-esteem scale, a series of 10
questions designed to assess self esteem, was used, along with questions designed to give a self
analysis rating in comparison to martial artists at an equivalent belt level.
Novices showed lower self-esteem than the other three groups while the other three were not
different from each other. When compared to members within their own club, self-esteem was
related to self-perception, but not self ratings of sportsmanship or discipline. Self-perception in
this case is very similar to the concept of perceived self-efficacy which is examined by Ozer and
Bandura (1990) and reviewed later. Self-esteem related to self-discipline when compared to
others across the USA. Trophy winners had greater self-esteem before the competition than did
non winners.
The authors concluded that 1-2 months of karate training was enough to raise self-esteem.
Measures on the groups that trained for longer periods showed no changes in this measure. The
self-perception of ability related to self-esteem. Self-perception of physical condition and self-
discipline was also important to self-esteem, and self-esteem predicted performance. In this study
then, it would seem that karate students have a realistic appreciation of their own abilities, and
that possession of these abilities is related to their self-esteem. Training in karate does not seem to
result in unrealistic appraisals of one's abilities.
This finding agrees with other work which would indicate that physical education students in
general have a realistic perception of their own physical abilities and skills, and that this internal
perception relates to both self-esteem and success.
Layton (1988) compared traditional Shotokan Karate students and dan ranks using the Eysenck
Personality Questionnaire. The dan ranks ranged from 5 to over 20 years of experience. No
differences were seen in personality when levels of dan grade were compared however. Dan
ranks were less extraverted and neurotic than the student ranks. On the measures of psychoticism
there were no differences. Layton suggested that those who are less extraverted, who are more
susceptible to conditioning and are inclined to live their lives within relatively precise and
narrow parameters are predisposed to reach the higher grades of karate which is a highly ordered
and personal artform. A similar mechanism may account for the lower neuroticism scores of the
dan grades as those who are calm and controlled will be able to better handle the demands of this
martial art. As this was a cross sectional study, Layton suggested that selection (student drop-out)
may account for a large proportion of the differences between student and dan grades.
Layton (1990) then reported another cross sectional study of traditional Shotokan Karate students
using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory of Spielberger et al. (1970 the state-trait anxiety
inventory: test manual form x Palo Alto Calif. Consulting Psychologists Press.). Subjects ranged
from novices to some black belts with 23 years training. Again, he found there were differences
between Kyu and Dan ranks on A-state and A-trait anxiety with the dan grades being less anxious
on each measure. More years of training was associated with less trait and less state anxiety.
Trait anxiety was not associated with dan rank but state anxiety was, with higher dan ranks
showing less state anxiety. Trait anxiety is a fairly stable personality characteristic and Layton
suggests that less anxious subjects might be more likely to train for longer periods accounting for
the difference between student and dan ranks. Layton then cites other studies that indicate acute
physical activity may lower anxiety, and suggests that karate training may also lower transitory
(state) anxiety levels. Again, the need for a longitudinal study to examine changes in personality
over time while training in a fighting art is apparent.
THERAPY AND MARTIAL ARTS
The following papers illustrate the potential role of martial arts as a therapeutic aid for the mental
health community.
Reciprocal inhibition therapy is possible using martial arts training as a method of invoking a
response inhibitory to anxiety at the same time as an anxiety evoking stimulus is presented to the
patient. A calming activity is practiced at the same time as an anxiety causing stimulus is
presented. This linkage of stimuli weakens the bond between the anxiety producing stimulus and
the buildup of anxiety. Gershman and Stedman (1971) used Kung Fu training to treat a man with
claustrophobia, and Karate to treat a man with a fear of flying. The researchers found that Kung Fu
exercises took the subject's anxiety levels to a rating of 0 in less than 1 minute. Graduated
exposure to confined spaces while doing Kung Fu exercises allowed the subject to experience a
fast recovery from claustrophobia, and remain comfortable at 6 months after the treatment. In the
second case the researchers linked Karate exercises and flying, reducing the subject's anxiety
levels to zero in 2 sessions. This approach was taken after trying relaxation techniques which
were deemed to be too slow. Again, 6 months after treatment, the subject remained well.
Seitz et al. (1990) recommended investigating martial arts as a model for energy management
when looking at mental health. Both disciplines focus on intrapsychic and interpersonal enery, as
well as the energy of being and existing. The martial arts focus directly on the energy involved in
dealing with our own emotions, perceptions of trust and fear, and conceptions of reality. They
also suggested that the martial arts may serve as models for interpersonal relationships and the
relationship of person to world. Both the therapist and the budoka deal with the energy (called ki
in Japanese) of being. The timing of a specific intervention by a therapist can be compared to the
timing of swordsmanship, both involve actions that must occur at specific moments in order to be
effective. In the words of the authors; "The martial arts have some important things to say in the
area of mental health, particularly in terms of energy" (p. 463).
MEN, AGGRESSION AND COMBAT ARTS
One of the most often stated goals of training in the martial arts is to reduce aggression and
increase self control. In older studies, two opposing theories on aggression were often proposed.
The catharsis theory attempted to explain a reduction in aggression through combat arts by
supposing that these arts provided a socially acceptable way to act out violence, thus "bleeding
off" the impulses. The circular theory assumed that aggression is increased through exposure to
aggression. The position of these two theories in sociological research has been discussed.
The anthropological lesson from non-literate societies is clear. Whatever genetic potential we
may have for aggressive behavior, early conditioning in cooperative behavior, and the
discouragement of anything resembling aggressive behavior serve to make an individual and a
society essentially unaggressive and cooperative. It remains to be seen what effect the fighting arts
may have on adults, who have gone through their early conditioning, and on children who are still
being socialized.
Johnson and Hutton (1955) wished to test the generally accepted idea that sports provide an outlet
for powerful emotions which are accumulated in the course of daily living. This idea of a
catharsis was first introduced by Aristotle who used it in the sense of a psychological cleansing
through watching tragic drama. In discussing this, the authors point out that unlike drama, sports
are highly structured and rule bound and include no terrible punishments for transgressors as are
found in classical drama. It is possible then, that with no punishment for the overtly displayed
aggression of violent sport, the athlete might experience strong feelings of guilt rather than a
catharsis. Another possibility might be that sports simply provide an outlet for a drive for physical
activity and that the strict rules prevent any possibility of emotional release. Finally, it is
possible that these same rules might function as a frustrating restriction which could actually lead
to greater aggression.
The authors tested intercollegiate wrestlers three weeks before the first match of the season
(control condition), four or five hours before the first match (pre-competition), and the next
morning after that (post-competition). Previous research had shown wrestling to be associated
with exceptional emotional stress. Buck's House-Tree-Person test of personality was used. This
projective test, which involves drawing a house, tree and person with crayons, was thought to be
suitable as it had a low refusal rate when applied to subjects in a highly disturbed emotional state.
Before the first match, the wrestler's IQ estimates dropped from an average of 110 to 92. The
subjects showed increased anxiety, compulsiveness, neurosis, and body consciousness. They
were more aggressive but under strict control, tending to be intrapunitive or self punishing rather
than directing the aggression outward. These results could indicate the effects of pre-competition
stress which results in a "general constriction of personality" in preparation for the match.
After the match, the IQ scores returned to normal, and the neurosis was gone. The aggressiveness
of the wrestlers was lower than the control condition, regardless of whether the wrestler had won
his match or not. These control scores were said to be somewhat higher in aggressiveness than
would normally be found.
The authors concluded that the results did indeed give support to the idea that sports have a
cathartic effect on aggressiveness.
Husman (1955) used a projective technique to study boxers, wrestlers, cross country runners and
a non-athlete, control group. Tests were administered before during and after the sports season
creating an experiment that was both cross-sectional over different sports and longitudinal with
regard to one season within sports. Aggression was broken down into several types.
Extrapunitiveness, where aggression is employed overtly and directed outwardly toward the
environment, Intrapunitiveness, where the aggression is turned by the subject upon himself,
Impunitiveness, where the aggression is evaded in an attempt to gloss over frustration.
Extra-punitive ego-defence is defined as the subject acting aggressively, extrapunitively, to
protect his ego.
Boxers were found to be the least aggressive of all the groups, they showed less overall
aggression than the wrestlers, the runners and the controls. Boxers had less tendency than the
cross country runners and the control subjects to express their aggression outwardly
(extrapunitiveness). They tended to be intrapunitive or impunitive, blaming themselves or
assigning no blame for frustrations. Boxers also seemed to show less intrapunitiveness than
wrestlers, runners and controls.
After a contest, the boxers showed more super-ego (some accusation, charge or incrimination of
the subject by someone else) than the controls, a result the authors suggested would indicate guilt
feelings for the overt actions of the contest.
Cross country runners tended to aggress outwardly (be extrapunitive), blame others to protect
their own egos, and have more ego defence than boxers. The runners were also more
extrapunitive, and less impunitive than the non-athlete control subjects. The runners had more
super-ego than the controls, which the authors speculated might reflect guilt over their increased
tendency to aggress against people and objects (extra-punitiveness).
These results could indicate that those with more aggressive personalities tended to become
runners while those with less aggressive personalities became boxers. This conclusion would,
however, seem to be counter-intuitive. The possibility that the combat sports actually produced
less aggressive students, rather than attracted them was not tested here. The effect of the sport
over the course of one season was, however, tested.
No significant differences were noted over the course of a season but the trends were reported.
Aggression tended to increase over the sporting season for all athletes. Combat episodes tended
to turn that aggression inward, to lower extra-punitiveness and ego defence as well.
The authors conclude that the aggression of the boxers was significantly lower than that of the
wrestlers, runners and control subjects. A season of sport participation tended to raise aggression
levels according to one test, while lowering extra-punitiveness, intra-punitiveness and super-ego
in another, but these results were not significant.
These two studies tend to support the idea that combative sport lowers aggressiveness. It should
be pointed out here that the aggressiveness measured in the combat athletes tended to be directed
inwardly rather that outward toward others. Neither of these studies support the view that
"violence begets violence", that combat sports increase the aggressiveness of the participants.
MEN AGGRESSION AND MARTIAL ARTS
More recent studies on aggression have focused on the eastern martial arts rather than on
wrestling or boxing (which is no longer in favour as a collegiate sport) and these will be
considered next. The conflict between the catharsis and the circular theory is still present although
the circular theory is now more commonly called the social learning theory.
Kroll and Crenshaw (1970) compared Karate students to students of several other sports. The
Karate students were more tense, conscientious, rule bound, and independent than gymnasts.
Compared to wrestlers and football players, karate students were more self sufficient, reserved
and detached.
Rothpearl (1980) measured hostility in non-karate student control subjects, novice karate students
and advanced students. Of a sample of 6 schools, 80% of were male. He found that the novice
karate group showed no differences from the control students which would suggest that there is no
self-selection of students on entry to the karate classes.
The karate students as a whole, appeared moderately suspicious, and favoured indirect hostility.
They would throw or break things when angry and play practical jokes rather than punch or
strike. The intermediate groups were higher in measures of argumentativeness, assaultiveness, and
had more varied methods of hostile expression than either the beginning or advanced students.
Karate students of higher rank showed less anxiety and hostility (verbal hostility, resentment,
indirect hostility, irritability and suspicion). He used novice students as controls in this study so
that there was no possibility of self-selection on entry to the art.
Rothpearl saw evidence for cathartic release in the advanced group, and evidence for circular
effects at the intermediate level. The greater number of methods of hostile expression in the
intermediate group may reflect the acquisition of new fighting skills. It was supposed that Karate
training exposed students to aggression eliciters but then, (reflected in the higher belt ranks)
trained the students to repress that aggression, thus they were eventually desensitized. Two
possible methods for producing this result are suggested, the first is simply not fighting in a
certain situation, which becomes a habit after a while. The second possibility concerns exposing
students to conditions of intense competition or pain, conditions that would normally elicit
fighting responses, and training the students restrain themselves.
Nosanchuk (1981) noted that there is strong evidence from the theories and work of Albert
Bandura (eg. Bandura 1973) to suggest that the acquisition of an aggressive repertoire, even if
directed toward self defence, has the effect of increasing aggressive behavior. In earlier work,
(Lord, and Nosanchuk, 1977) the author noted that taking a nonviolent nonretaliatory stance seems
to invite physical violence. This seems to leave one with a choice of being either a victim or an
aggressor.
In searching for a third alternative, Nosanchuk noted conventional wisdom stating that training in
one of the traditional Oriental martial arts should provide one with self defence skills while not
raising aggressiveness. Nosanchuk also noted that learning self defence skills may actually
change ones physical appearance enough to prevent problems with possible attackers and cites a
magazine article on self defence where the author stated the women became more confident,
purposeful and less vulnerable in their body movements.
To test the relationship of martial arts with aggression, Nosanchuk took measures of aggressive
fantasy on traditional karate students at various skill levels. In this cross sectional study, she
found that longer training was correlated with less aggressiveness. She tested 4 personality
variables to try to determine the reason for the reduction; self-control, self-assertiveness,
self-esteem and self-confidence. Nosanchuk studied three groups by their rank. Beginners were
white and yellow belts, and advanced students were brown and black belts. Intermediate students
were those between. A drop in aggressiveness was associated with increasing belt level. Self
confidence rose but then fell as students of increasing belt level were examined. The reduction in
aggression with increasing belt level did not seem to be associated with changes in self-control,
self-assertiveness, self-esteem or self-confidence. The training program, seemed to both raise
self-esteem and lower aggressiveness but independently of each other. Higher scores on
self-confidence were accompanied with higher scores on aggressiveness in the intermediate belt
levels, and both dropped in the higher belt levels with the seniors reporting they had much room
for improvement. The sub-factor of "constructiveness" was found to be associated with lower
levels of aggressiveness but was not associated with belt level. Constructiveness is involved with
solution-oriented thinking.
It is worth noting that the rise in self-confidence and aggression in this intermediate group seems
to parallel the rise in argumentativeness and numbers of hostile methods found by Rothpearl in
his intermediate group. A rise in self confidence may allow the students to respond to challenges
more directly that previously. The subsequent drop in self confidence found by Nosanchuk and
drop in aggressiveness found by Rothpearl are also likely to be linked.
The study of martial arts would seem to provide an alternative to being either an aggressor or a
victim, since the learning of self defence skills, at least in a traditional karate class, does not
seem to make one more aggressive. This finding was contrary to the expected finding and
supported the conventional wisdom. Nosanchuk suggested that the mechanism for lowering
aggression may be the traditional methods of training themselves. Traditional karate training, as
defined by the author, stresses self control, conflict avoidance, and care in the amount of physical
contact allowed during training. Other things which are stressed, include kata (patterned
movements), meditation, philosophy, and respect for others. Another possible mechanism by
which higher belt ranks might become associated with lower aggression is that the instructors
slowly ease out aggressive students, thus selecting for low aggression. Nosanchuk proposed
examining nontraditional dojos (those teaching "kickboxing" or agonistic skills only) to see if
aggression rises with experience under this type of training. If it does, this would indicate
something in the traditional training method which mediates this effect. The second, selection,
theory could also be examined by looking at dropouts. If those who drop out of a traditional
school are more aggressive than those who stay, this would suggest a method by which the higher
belt levels test less aggressive.
Nosanchuk and MacNeil (1989) questioned the impact of the acquisition of aggressive skills on
aggression. They hypothesized that longer training would be related to less aggression in schools
giving traditional teaching, while longer training would be related to more aggression in schools
using "modern" teaching methods. In this case, traditional training is assumed to allow the study of
self defence techniques without arousing aggressive feelings. There is a certain element of
detachment from the violence. This result might be due to the stress on ritual fighting, or kata,
which present no opponent. Another factor might be the amount of negative sanction toward
violence from the sensei, who is a hypothesized to be a model of restraint and non-aggression for
the students. This definition of a traditional school would tend to place it in the
religious/philosophical/spiritual classification of civilian arts as proposed by the International
Hoplological Society (see Donohue and Taylor, 1994). A "modern" school was classed as one
which put much less emphasis on kata, as opposed to technical instruction, drill and sparring.
Modern schools were also defined as those which did not disallow heavier contact to the head or
other vital areas during sparring, were less concerned about respect for the teacher, the uniform
and the school, and put less importance on meditation, and philosophy. Under this classification,
"modern" schools were not particularly different from the "traditional" schools, but stressed other
aspects of the training. There is no indication that the modern schools were sport oriented,
fighting oriented (dueling) self-defence oriented or otherwise different. Perhaps the difference
here was more along the lines of the perceived separation between "jutsu" and "do" forms, with an
emphasis on technique as vs. philosophy.
The authors hypothesized that the expected findings of lower aggression in traditional schools
might be a result of either selection (modern schools may tolerate more aggression) or training.
The authors designed a cross sectional study of 7 schools, which also included "quitters" since
they would presumably have different reasons to drop out of each type of school. If selection is
operating, traditional schools might show less aggressive students because those who were
aggressive would be expected to drop out or switch to modern style schools. If selection is not
operating on aggression, then students would quit for other reasons and should show the same
aggression levels as that of the similarly experienced "stayers". All students were tested using an
aggressive fantasy measurement where they were exposed to a scenario and then asked to rate
how likely they were to respond in various ways. A further projective test was used based on
responses to six Rosenzweig Picture Frustration items.
The authors found that advanced "traditional" students were indeed less aggressive than basic or
intermediate students. Intermediate and advanced "modern" students on the other hand, were more
aggressive than basic students but this was a small difference. There was little difference
between intermediate and advanced students for either style, but the modern students were more
aggressive than the traditional students. The greatest differences were seen in the advanced
student levels. This supports the idea that some aspect of the training in the "traditional" schools is
responsible for the reduction in aggression. As both types of training are likely to be otherwise
similar, future research should concentrate on these factors.
As to the selection hypothesis, quitters showed no differences in aggression compared to stayers
of comparable belt level. There were no "movers" who went from a traditional to a modern dojo.
On this basis, it would seem that the selection theory was not supported.
The authors concluded that modern training methods increased student's aggressiveness while
traditional training methods reduced it. There was support for this difference being a result of
training rather than of student selection. The particular mechanism of aggression reduction is still
unknown, but the authors suggest: 1. The sensei operating as a model of restraint and control, 2.
the effects of teaching ethics and philosophy along with the physical skills and 3. kata practice
may be responsible.
The apparent reduction in aggression in boxers reported by Husman (1955) must be reconciled
with the increase in aggression seen for "modern" karate students. Is boxing, an agonistic, combat
sport different than "kickboxing". One possible difference might be the intensity and frequency of
training, with boxers working out much harder and more frequently than the typical karate student.
Another difference might be in the method of sparring, boxers intend full contact strikes to the
head and body, there is no question of who is the better fighter. As a result, boxers may learn to
withhold and control their blows for the sake of continued training. Karate students on the other
hand, may be able to "slip in a good one" now and then but rely largely on rules against full
contact to prevent retaliation in kind. This will of course depend on the type of karate training
being considered.
A point not emphasized by the authors in this paper concerns the relatively short time it took to
decrease the aggressiveness of the students. The intermediate and advanced students of the
traditional classes showed roughly the same amount of aggression while the beginners showed
much greater levels. It would appear from this and other work that the beneficial effects of
training do not require much time to become evident.
Trulson and Kim (1985) conducted a cross sectional study of Tae Kwon Do students using the
Jackson Personality Inventory. Those students with less than one year of experience were found
to be no different than the general population on several psychological measures, indicating that
there was no selection occurring on entry into the martial art classes. As experience level in the
martial art increased, students showed lower anxiety, a higher sense of responsibility, a decrease
in willingness to take risks, they were less "radical", had increased self esteem, and were more
socially intelligent. These trends were especially pronounced in the black belt levels. Other
effects were seen in increased physical fitness, defence skills, self discipline, concentration, and
respect.
The authors note that aggressiveness often comes from low self-esteem, and the martial arts may
reduce aggressiveness through this mechanism. This does not agree with the Nosanchuk study
above which would seem to indicate no relationship between self-esteem and aggression.
Trulson, in a related study (Trulson, 1986) used several measures of personality to examine male
"juvenile delinquents" given training in "traditional" Tae Kwon Do, "modern" Tae Kwon Do and
in physical activities, all with the same instructor. Juvenile delinquents were defined as those
under 18 scoring highly on psychopathic deviation (disregard for the rules expected of
individuals), schizophrenia (lack of social graces and negative or "odd" behavior) and
hypomania (expansive behavior, behavior not within the normal bounds of custom. These subjects
also scored low on measures of interest in the opposite sex, suggesting a predominately
masculine type of response. The study was longitudinal, with measures being taken before
training and after 6 months of training. All classes were taught by the author.
The "traditional" training included meditation, general and specific Tae Kwon Do exercises
including kata, lectures on philosophy stressing respect, confidence, self-esteem, fitness,
patience, perseverance and honour. Personal responsibility was stressed in these lectures. The
"modern" training contained only free-sparring and self-defence techniques as well as other
physical exercises. The control group participated in various physical activities and was
intended to control for maturation and contact with the instructor.
At the end of 6 months the "traditional" group displayed a normal psychological profile, with no
delinquent traits. They displayed an aggressiveness below the average, as well as lowered
anxiety, increased self-esteem, social adroitness, and orthodoxy. The "modern" training group
showed a greater tendency toward delinquency than before the training, a very large increase in
aggressiveness, and in general, the opposite of the other traits noted for the "traditional" group.
The control group showed no changes in aggressiveness but some increase in social adroitness
and self-esteem.
The author notes the effects on aggressiveness in the "modern" group with extreme concern as
there are many martial arts schools now teaching youths which may be using this type of training
and which may be producing more aggressive students.
Trulson attributes the effects of the "traditional" training to four things: 1. The instructor acts as an
authority figure to the students, 2. the instructor acts as a positive role model, 3. the physical
conditioning is intense and the student uses much of the excess energy possessed at this age and 4.
the practice sessions incorporate philosophical/psychological conditioning.
In a follow-up study conducted over a year after the experiment, "traditional" students were
non-delinquent while "modern" and control group students were.
Skelton et al. (1991) studied boys and girls aged 6 to 11 for aggression level with respect to five
belt levels. These students were all from the same Tae Kwon Do organization. Aggressiveness
was found to decline as the belt rank increased. Aggression was ranked by the parents in this
case, not the children themselves. The authors note that they had no way of controlling for the
effects of student selection based on drop outs in this study, and thus cannot comment on its
influence on the results.
WOMEN, FEAR, SELF DEFENCE AND COMBAT ARTS
From an extensive review of the assault literature (Taylor 1992), it is apparent that the main
concern in the self defence or martial arts training of women should be the reduction of fear and
anxiety in order to increase their involvement in society. The effects of the fear of attack are of
far more importance than is the actual risk of physical assault.
WOMEN AND SPORTS
Williams et al. (1970) noted that in general, for all sports, athletes show low anxiety and
neuroticism, and are high on measures of surgency, aggression, achievement, expediency, and
independence. Athletes also tend to be ambitious, disciplined, sociable, sensitive, deferential,
venturesome, bold, and confident. Often however, no differences from the general population are
seen.
In this study the authors compared the results of a 16PF and an Edwards Personal Preference
study, to the skill level of women fencers. National level female fencers were ambitious, had a
desire to succeed, were high on abstract thinking, imaginative, and creative. They were fast
learners, independent, had a below average desire to affiliate, were loners, not followers, were
aggressive, had a low desire to lead or dominate but were dominant in personality. This indicates
that they had no desire to either dominate or be dominated. The fencers showed average scores
on stability and anxiety, were reserved rather than outgoing, and had a low desire to need or be
needed. The main difference between high and low level competitors was on the factors for
dominance.
There is little doubt that physical activities such as sports can modify or change the psychological
makeup of women as well as of men.
WOMEN AND MARTIAL ARTS
Finkenberg (1990) was interested in exploring the relationship of martial arts to self-concept in
women. He noted that many sports are reported to have a relationship with self-concept, that
self-concept may be enhanced through acquisition or mastery of a new skill, and that novices are
most likely to gain in self-concept through participation in physical activities.
Finkenberg compared women in Tae Kwon Do (TKD) classes to women in general health classes
(the control) using the Tennessee Self-Concept Scale. This is a scale of 100 descriptive
statements which the subjects use to portray his or her own self-picture by assigning each a score
out of 5 from completely false to completely true.
The study included pre-test and post-test measures making it longitudinal over the test period of 8
weeks. The subjects served as their own controls and the health class would control for other
factors which might occur over the time period. Finkenberg noted that self concept and
performance is related in many sports. Self concept and behavior, general personality and mental
health are also related.
Compared to the control, a health and consumer health class, the TKD class showed no difference
on self criticism, moral-ethical measures, family values or behavior. The TKD class did show
higher self concept. On the subscales the class also showed higher physical, personal, social
identity, and satisfaction self concept than did the controls.
The TKD class seemed to improve self concept without affecting other social values and
behaviors. The authors conclude that an 8 week course of this martial art will enhance the
self-concept of women. The study agrees with the findings of Duthie et al. (1978) on self
confidence, and of Richman and Rehberg, (1986) on self-esteem.
Madden (1990) noted that in previous studies of martial arts, advanced students appeared to be
more mature and showed higher self-esteem than less advanced students, which was associated
with winning in tournaments. Male karate students had a better body image but were otherwise
similar to others in personality. Improved body self-image might be beneficial to women students.
In studies of self-defence courses for women, students showed enhanced perceptions of efficacy
and control, while exhibiting decreased feelings of vulnerability to assault and decreased
anxious, intrusive thoughts. Self-Defence courses may also increase feelings of control over
danger in assault victims.
Madden notes that martial arts classes, with their stress on restraint may be counterproductive for
women who might need to be taught less restraint (see Kidder et al. 1983). A study of karate
classes was undertaken to test their effect on women. Previous research by Madden, at the three
month point in classes, indicated that karate students felt less in control of events and more
vulnerable to misfortune than did physical education students at a similar stage. This might
indicate that those who feel like victims enroll in karate but it might also show that karate classes
do not always enhance feelings of control. At the initial stages of training, karate classes may
make students feel less able to defend themselves.
The 1990 study was set up as a longitudinal survey over one semester of classes. Pre and post
tests were done on four semesters of students. The results of the four classes did not differ from
each other. The style was American karate, based on Isshin Ryu and the same syllabus was
followed each semester. The course covered basic techniques, a kata, self-defence moves, limited
sparring, and lectures on attitude and martial arts philosophy. The course differed from a
traditional course in that instruction was given in English rather than in Japanese or Korean.
Madden wished to examine the student's perceived control and vulnerability. A loss of perceived
control is often associated with depression, so that factor was also examined. The study explored
differences in the perceptions of women and men. It also explored differences in students who
had been physically assaulted as compared to those who had not.
Overall, students at the end of the course felt in better physical condition, were less depressed, and felt they had a better control over the avoidance of attack and preventing serious injury if attacked. They also felt less vulnerable to having bad things happen, to being attacked and to being injured in an attack.
When women were compared to men, the women felt less able to control events in general, more
likely to be attacked, more likely to be injured if attacked, and more vulnerable to bad things in
general. The same pattern was seen in tests before and after the class, but women improved on
their scores. The men also improved when compared to themselves in pre and post class testing.
Sixty three percent of the students had been previously attacked by someone who wanted to harm
them. All the attacks were physical and none were sexual in nature. When comparing students
who were previously attacked to those who had not been attacked, the students who had been
attacked felt less depressed, and more in control over being attacked. Madden did not report the
separate results by sex. This result is similar to one reported by Ozer and Bandura (1990)
described later. Perhaps students who were previously attacked have a more realistic idea of an
attack and the usefulness of the techniques learned
Contrary to expectations based on victimization literature, the attacked students did not differ from
those who had not been attacked on many variables, and where they did, they felt in greater
control than the others. The fact that none of these assaults had been sexual, and that they were
mostly fights, broken up quickly may distinguish them from other assaults reported in the literature.
When asked why they had taken the course, self defence was given as the reason in 66% of the
cases, general health in 61%. Thirty nine percent expressed a desire to learn the skills, 34%
wanted to improve their appearance through physical conditioning and the same number (34%)
wanted to improve self-confidence. The same reasons were given at pre and post class testing.
When asked, 94% of students said they were willing to hurt an attacker, and 84% said they would
be able to resist an attacker. There was no change between pre and post class answers to these
questions and there was no difference in answer when attacked and non attacked students were
compared. The idea that Karate training increases aggression is not supported by these results
since the class did not change student's expectations of resistance, although the expectations of
resistance were very high, and any changes may have been masked by this.
Madden notes that while most students join a martial arts class for self-defence, martial arts
training is not exclusively self-defence oriented, and that the skills may take several years to
learn. Women who wish to learn self-defence may be better off in a class devoted to teaching
women self-defence. There may be differences between the effects of self-defence and martial
arts training on women, and martial arts instructors should attempt to recognize women's different
socialization and experience with sport. To counter these arguments, Madden noted that both
sexes benefitted from the karate class in the short term (29 classes), showing enhanced feelings of
control over physical assault, reduced perceived vulnerability and reduced perceived likelihood
of being attacked.
WOMEN AND SELF DEFENCE
Kidder et al. (1983) noted that fear is the most common reaction to victimization and that fear
exacerbates the victimization. After an attack it is common for fears and nightmares to persist.
Fear makes assault completion much more likely. Women who had been raped, most often
reacted with fear during the attack while women who avoided the attack, most often reacted with
suspicion and anger at the prospect of assault. There is a general observation, there was no
difference in reaction or results even when weapons are involved. The authors note that in
psychological experiments it was found that women were just as aggressive as men when told
their behavior was private or when their aggressive behavior was rewarded. In general however,
women tended to show more indirect aggression than did men. The authors point out that self
defence and assertiveness training needs to be aimed at women because they don't know "how to
say no". Women must thus take responsibility for the solution to assault, while not accepting
responsibility for the problem.
In this paper three studies are presented. In the first, the authors were participant observers in two
self defence classes given twice a week for 14 weeks. From the start to the end of the course, the
women felt stronger, braver, more in control, and more able to defend themselves. They were
both more cautious and more confident. The women learned to recognize a potential attack as well
as to handle the physical aspects. In these classes the teachers told the women to "get mad if
someone tampers with you without permission" to convert fear to anger. In the practical test at the
end of the course, the women were attacked by members of a wrestling team. The women did
indeed get angry as they defended themselves. The authors noted that students must be taught to
separate consensual from offensive acts, and to define their personal space.
The second study examined the effects of self defence on perceived rights of resistance. The
authors measured student's perceptions of rights before and after the class. In one class a male
instructor taught, while in another a male and female taught as a team. The classes were similar in
response at the start of the training but differed by the end. The class with the lone male instructor
showed a decline in the perceived right to resist from start to finish, and no other changes. In the
jointly taught class students showed an increased feeling of the right to resist, the feeling that they
would resist, a reduction in the feeling that they would be afraid, and a reduction in the feeling of
being helpless. The class was neutral in their perceived likelihood of feeling angry. Both classes
were taught the same techniques but the teaching methods were different. The single male
instructor was very cautionary, warning that the techniques should be used carefully because the
attacker "might be a kid" and the women "could get sued". The instructor didn't talk about the
student's rights to resist. The joint instructors stressed these rights to resist. From this result it is
argued that the "psychological" lessons taught in these classes are more important than the
specific techniques.
The third study was of a class of assertiveness training, teaching women to say no, as well as
teaching them how to say "I want". All these classes showed an increase in feelings of the right to
refuse, the right to request, and a perceived likelihood that they would refuse or request.
Ozer and Bandura (1990) studied a Mastery Modeling program (Model Mugging) of self defence.
This course stressed learning physical skills against unarmed male sexual assailants who wear
special padding which allows the women to counterattack with full force. The authors looked at
the mechanisms for psychological change which were involved in this program. The course
showed that students developed an enhanced perceived coping ability and better thought control.
They experienced a decreased perceived vulnerability to assault (fear), lower negative thoughts
and lower anxiety.
The regulation of behavior is through a person's perceived self-efficacy and through disturbing
negative thoughts. Empowerment, in this study, was defined as giving students the skills and the
self-belief to exert control over their own life. Empowerment works through perceived
self-efficacy. Women's lives are thought to be restricted by a sense of inefficacy or the inability to
cope with the threat of sexual assault. It is imperative that methods be found to reduce and control
both this fear and the physical likelihood of sexual assault. The authors give a series of relevant
findings from previous studies. 1. 80% of U.S. rapes are accomplished by unarmed attackers. 2.
Resistance works to prevent rape. 3. Physical resistance does not increase injury. 4. Screaming
plus physical resistance is the best overall strategy.
At this point is must be noted that women need a perceived self-efficacy to resist, and they must
have this even if they already posses self defence skills. Even untrained women, if they are
dominant, assertive, with an internal locus of control (they believe they can affect change) are
highly likely to resist an attack. These women can be assumed to have a high self-efficacy. On the
other hand, having the tools of resistance does not guarantee they will be used, especially if the
woman so trained does not really believe the techniques will work.
Perceived self-efficacy affects activity, all people tend to avoid actions and environments where
they believe they can't do anything to prevent discomfort. People tend to go to places they believe
they can handle. The perceived self-efficacy to exert control over threatening events has a direct
effect on anxiety. Threat is not a fixed quality, it is not related to "reading the signs" but is
assessed by each person with relation to their perceived self-efficacy. If one feels one can cope
with the situation, there is little reason to fear. If one can't cope, one tends to dwell on that
inability, and fear is the result. Perceived self-efficacy also mediates anxiety and stress. Fear and
stress are low when faced with an event within the perceived self-efficacy. As self-doubts in
coping arise, there is a large increase in subjective stress levels and physiological stress arousal.
Perceived self-efficacy also effects thought patterns. A person with a high perceived self-efficacy
in controlling intrusive negative thought will attempt to control those thoughts, and succeed. A
low perceived ability to control thoughts leads, by a vicious cycle to anxiety. It is not the absolute
number of negative thoughts, but the perceived ability to control them that causes anxiety.
Fear itself does not directly affect behavior, women will walk alone at night, even when they are
scared to do so. The lack of fear does not cause women to neglect self protective measures.
These are taken even if the women are not scared at the moment. Perceived self efficacy affects
fear and action by its influence on the judgement of personal risk and vulnerability. Perceived
self-efficacy is involved in the judgement of the riskiness of any particular situation.
Belief in self-efficacy is increased by:
1. Mastery experiences, in doing what is fear inducing. Successful performance of fearful actions means perceived self-efficacy is increased, while unsuccessful performance means perceived self-efficacy declines.
2. Modeling experiences, watching as a model shows how to cope with a situation.
3. Social persuasion and
4. changing physiological states that signal strength or other desirable traits.
The self defence course studied in this paper uses mastery modeling (1 and 2) techniques, and
also provides physiological clues to self defence capacity and the verification of that ability by
"fighting" the modeling attackers. The course is mainly physical, emphasizing disabling strikes to
vital targets on a padded attacker. Mastery comes through student effort, while the modeling
component is provided by watching instructors and other students do the techniques.
Students were tested before and after the course and 6 months after that. Over the period of the
course and at 6 months later, the students showed increased perceived self-efficacy in the ability
to defend themselves, and to control potential threats. The perceived self-efficacy to control
negative thoughts did not change during the course but at 6 months post-course the perceived
ability to control negative thoughts was increased over the pre-course tests. It is not surprising
that negative thoughts about attack should be relatively high immediately after a self defence
course is completed. A stronger coping perceived self-efficacy led to a stronger thought control
perceived self-efficacy and less negative thoughts.
An important point to note is that skill level in the self defence techniques as ranked by the
instructors and models was not related to perceived self efficacy. The acquisition of skills is not
enough to instill the belief in the ability to use them. This finding applies directly (and negatively)
to the theory that the acquisition of an aggressive repertoire leads to aggressive behavior.
The women showed no change in their estimates of danger in society at large, just in their own
ability to judge and deal with it. They showed a reduced fear of assault. Higher coping perceived
self-efficacy led to a lower sense of vulnerability, lower anxiety, and a better sense of judging
risk. Perceived self-efficacy of controlling thoughts was not related to perceived risk or
vulnerability which would indicate that these students are not fooling themselves into thinking
they are safe. The judgement of risk in general and the judgement of perceived risk are unrelated.
In addition to these immediate effects, the women also showed an enduring increase in
participation in society, they were more active in community, social and recreational activities.
The perceived ability to cope with attack, or to control thoughts both led to higher involvement. A
high judgement of vulnerability is related to negative thoughts, and means a reduced ability to
judge risk at any time, more negative thoughts, more anxiety, and more avoidance of outside
activity.
Some of the women taking the course had been previously assaulted. The pre-course testing
showed these women to have lower coping perceived self-efficacy, to be more avoidant, to have
more negative thoughts, poor risk determination ability, and to have greater feelings of
vulnerability. At the post-course and 6 month follow up testing, the assaulted women showed no
differences from the other women. In fact, the assaulted women showed better perceived
self-efficacy to control thoughts, less negative thought and lower anxiety about sexual assault.
This indicates the powerful therapeutic value of self defence courses, and their ability to change
psychological states.
The question arises, "does self defence really work, or are these women being given a false
self-confidence"? No concerns of this type were voiced by those women who had taken the
course. They were not more reckless, but more adaptable to situations.
In self reports of 40 ___ attacks by 8000 alumni of this course, there were 38 ___ escapes. 30 ___
women disabled their attacker, while 8 ___ men ran away. Two women did not escape, but chose
to submit because they were facing weapons. There were also over one hundred reports of
de-escalations of assault, using verbal techniques taught in the course, ie. a strong no. (__ check
figures!)
Patricia McDaniel (1993) notes that both women and men are afraid of crime but that women's
fears are greater than men's even though their risk of crime and injury is actually smaller. This
greater fear of crime is usually attributed to a fear of rape.
McDaniel notes that learning self defence skills may not guarantee a woman's safety, but they do
provide women with a degree of power to determine the outcome of an attack, and prevent
women from automatically assuming the role of victim. The martial arts often take years to master,
while women's self-defence classes teach skills which can be mastered in 6-8 weeks. This
self-defence training is as much psychological as physical, helping women overcome socialized
tendencies toward fear, helplessness, passivity and low self-esteem, giving them a sense of their
right to protect themselves.
The author reviews the literature on the role of physical resistance in rape avoidance and finds
that there is a good case for resistance as a method to avoid attack, avoid injury, and avoid
feelings of fear and helplessness. McDaniel then goes on to discuss several objections to fighting
back, and the relevant research which would seem not to support these objections.
McDaniel then reports the results of a study of fear levels in women, before and after a
self-defence class. She used eight measures of fear to characterize New Zealand women in a
self-defence class called "Positive Action", and compared them to a control group (YMCA fitness
class). The control subjects were less fearful than the participants of the self-defence course at
the beginning of the classes. At the end of the classes, the students in the self-defence course
showed reductions in all fears, as well as better self-confidence than the controls. The author
suggests that although most women join a self-defence class because of fear, even non-fearful
women can benefit from learning these skills.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Henderson and Bialeschki (1993) noted that women are restricted by fears for their physical and
psychological safety, psychological safety being a fear of harassment because of bad body image.
They call for all health, physical education, recreation and dance professionals to address this
problem but don't suggest how.
Some immediate suggestions come to mind which may address the problems of male aggression,
female fear, and perceived gender inequality.
"Traditional" martial arts training (as defined by Nosanchuk, Madden and Trulson) should be
made available to high school students. Realistically this would be in an extracurricular format
since the number of instructors is limited. Traditional training would provide a way to control
aggression levels in men at a critical point in their lives, when they are changing from potentially
abused children to potentially abusive adults. Although studies show that it is early childhood that
is the decisive time for learning aggressive or non-aggressive behavior, it is not likely that
martial arts training will be acceptable in the public school curriculum in the near future. This is
not to say that it is impossible to teach young children the martial arts, as the hundreds of "kids
classes" across North America will demonstrate. The ability of martial arts to change the
attitudes of adults, as suggested in the papers reviewed above, would suggest a similar ability to
change the attitudes of adolescents.
Martial arts training for both men and women would allow them to learn new ways to respond and
deal with aggressive impulses, and to become more accepting of their alternate gender impulses,
as is seen in Konzak and Boudreau (1984). Women who are more accepting of their masculine
side, and men more accepting of their feminine side could contribute to a more general equality.
Self defence training should be included in all high school physical education programs, and even,
perhaps in the lower grades. It seems undeniable that self defence courses benefit women, and
there is no reason to believe that they would not benefit boys as well. Self defence is not difficult
to learn and teach, and the practice would fit nicely into any system of physical training currently
running in schools. There is always the fear, however, that young children taught how to defend
themselves would use these skills to beat up other children.
Boulton (1991) studied playful and aggressive fighting in middle school children. He found that
children have a very good sense of what is rough and tumble play and what is aggressive
behavior. It was rare, in Boulton's study, to see a rough and tumble incident escalate into an
aggressive incident, which would indicate that children of this age have good self-control and can
limit their encounters to "agreed upon" rules. While the ability of children to distinguish between
play and fighting does not guarantee that they will not use self-defence skills to hurt each other in
a fight, it does indicate that they would not accidentally harm each other with the skills while
playing. It could also be argued that children who wished to harm each other would find ways to
do so without exotic fighting skills. The type of bare-handed self-defence skills taught to children
would not necessarily concentrate on striking or throwing skills designed to damage an attacker,
in fact escape and evasion skills would likely be more practical for children who lack the
strength and weight to seriously damage an adult attacker. As for such skills as eye or throat
strikes, children already possess this knowledge.
There is evidence that education programs can give children who are kindergarten-aged (Harvey
et al. 1988) and those who are in grades 4 to 6 (Sigurdson et al. 1987) valuable information about
the prevention of sexual abuse. These children can both understand and learn this type of
self-defence material. Conte and others (Conte et al. 1986) examined several sexual abuse
prevention programs for young children. They state that: "The value of self-defence training may
not be just in teaching children how to defend against assaults, but also that such skill increases
children's confidence in their abilities to protect themselves. This increase in confidence may be
assessed by potential offenders who sense the child is 'not an easy mark'" (p.149). The authors
recognize that self-defence training for children is controversial but "Even if children are not
likely to be successful in using self-defence techniques to resist or escape, if research indicates it
does increase children's self-confidence it may be a helpful prevention technique." (p. 150) That
research should be done.
Richard Barth (Barth 1993) presents an analysis of life-skill training which may be initiated in
schools. He combined training in self-protection and self-control and gave an analysis of what
specific skills are needed by children from pre-kindergarten through high school age. The
combination of self-protection and self-control skills is quite similar to the description of a
"traditional" martial art with its combination of fighting skill and instruction in respect, etiquette,
and personal responsibility.
A final comment by Conte et al. (1986) is important. They state that "sexual abuse of children is
also an inherent condition of a society which allows the strong to abuse the weak." (p. 154) If
self-defence training has even a small chance to equalize the power imbalance between child and
abuser, or between adolescent woman and abuser, than this type of training belongs in the school
curriculum.
Even if the training is never used, it may actually be preventing abuse. Leland-Young and Nelson
(1987) describe a self-defence program for women designed to prevent and treat sexual assault by
re-socializing women in non-victim behavior. The program contains segments on theory, strategy
and physical tactics aimed at ending, rather than winning, an encounter. The authors suggest
strongly that women who take a self-defence course may actually be deterring attackers before
they are aware of the potential problem. They cite research on an attacker's choice of victims
which suggests that attackers may pass over non-victim-like women before settling on a passive
woman. The authors estimated that women trained in their course were three times less likely to
be selected by an assailant than women who had not been trained.
Some research is still needed to clarify the best teaching methods for achieving the particular
results desired. Some of the papers reviewed above (Nosanchuk and MacNeil 1989; Kidder et
al. 1983) suggest that different teaching styles can give very different results. Kidder and others
demonstrated that simply learning the techniques of self defence was not enough to increase the
likelihood that they would be used, and some of the reasons for this were outlined in Ozer and
Bandura (1990).
It may be necessary to define not only the psychological teaching method or the physical
techniques to study, but the correct combination of the two in order to produce superior students.
Landers et al. (1986) studied the factors associated with good performance in a group of
competitive archers. Most studies of elite athletes have concentrated on psychological measures
related to performance, ignoring the physical skills in the assumption that at elite levels they are
not different. The authors combined the results of the 16PF test with physical measures to obtain a
good prediction of performance. This type of information could be used by coaches to design
better programs for better performance. Superior archers were found to have better leg strength,
and better reaction times. The most important factors were that they thought less about past
mistakes, were successful in using visual imagery, and had high self confidence. Anxiety levels
were not related to performance, indicating that at this level, stress is not a factor. Using
Bandura's self-efficacy theory (Bandura, 1977), the authors speculate that self confidence (or
perceived self efficacy) is the key intervening variable between visual imagery, thinking of past
mistakes and performance. Confidence has a mutual relationship with performance, improvements
in one bringing about improvements in the other.
Teaching methods for martial arts or self defence classes should take into account these findings.
Physical skills should be taught in a graduated manner so that students are constantly exposed to
successful performances which will raise their perceived self-efficacy at the same time as their
performance improves. Visual imagery can provide a way for students to constantly review and
even improve a modeled performance so methods of imaging should be taught as well.
Seaborne (1985) investigated mental training strategies to see if they improved Karate
performance. Relaxation, visualization, positive self-instruction, or coping instruction, may all be
of use to some who have trouble controlling negative thoughts but not others. Seaborne studied
the effects of several approaches to training over a ten week period. Training methods consisted
of either individualized programs for each student, or menu type programs (a package approach)
allowing students to pick their own strategies. Both methods showed better performance at the
end of the period, being superior to both no strategy and randomly assigned strategies. The study
underlines the importance of mental work on the control of the mind and thoughts along with
physical work on the techniques. Students can pick their own mental training strategy with
minimal guidance and obtain the methods they need but providing a strategy to someone who does
not need that particular method is not useful.
The value of an instructor who has a range of motivational tools to give to those who need it is
obvious. This study looked at physical performance, and found that the psychological state of the
performer was important. The psychological and physical effects of martial arts training are not
related in only one direction. Studies have shown that physical training affects mental state, and
that mental state affects physical performance.
While self defence courses have quite definite goals and results, the martial arts have the potential
to teach things other than self-control and self-defence. Which results are desired from the
training may influence the training method.
Ken Min (1979) discussed the potential role of martial arts training in the educational setting.
Although his comments are concentrated on the Japanese arts and philosophy, using several
Japanese terms, his comments could also be applied to other fighting arts and other spiritual
traditions.
Min pointed out that the budo are associated with mu, emptiness, "mu is an ego-less state of mind
that frees one from fear and failure, even in death." To achieve this state, training in Zen
meditation during a martial arts class has tremendous importance. In this respect, a martial arts
class can be a "middleman" between the self and the universe.
Most North American Universities concentrate on varsity teams to the detriment of intramural and
individual sports training. There are few students involved in these sports consuming the bulk of
the available resources. Min proposes that martial arts training can counteract this trend,
providing a cheap alternative activity for those who are not varsity athletes. Budo training is
increasing in popularity but not supported by the schools, it is not rooted in North American
culture. Classes are usually presented by extramural clubs, and sometimes as part of the physed
program. Few schools recognize martial arts as varsity sports but most universities have
individual competitors and often unofficial school teams. Martial arts classes at universities are
usually coed.
Min gives several reasons why the budo are becoming popular. The first is the influence of
movies and magazines which present a distorted view of the arts. The second is that they satisfy a
need. In the liberal arts curriculum there should be the ideal of building the body and mind in
harmony. This should be the goal of physical education in any school, not "the big game". Western
sports ideals are not appealing to many, the aggressiveness and team spirit may seem wrong.
Budo offers an alternative, providing self-knowledge, self-control, and unity with nature rather
than self satisfaction, the defeat of others, and the control of nature.
Budo also offers access to Eastern thought (and philosophy) unencumbered by language and
culture. It teaches the five Ss (self-discipline, self-training, self-control, self-confidence,
self-respect) as well as the more obvious self-defence. According to Min the most important
aspect of martial arts is mental training to allow a calm response to all situations. A group of
stable people can provide great assistance to unstable societies. Some of the other social benefits
include the possibility of intersexual practice, rather than segregated sports classes, improvements
in aesthetics, posture, dance, and the possibility of almost unlimited self-expression.
CONCLUSION
It is our hope that this review of the wide range of research literature, focused on the
psychological effects of the fighting arts, will provoke thought, discussion and further research.
The literature would seem to support the notion that training in the combat arts will produce
psychological change in the student, at least in the short term. How these changes occur, and what
the long term effects of training are, is still to be discovered. There seems to be great potential
for the use of training in the combat arts to reduce aggression and assault in our society. The fact
that this seems to go against common sense makes further, careful investigation of the subject most
important.
REFERENCES
(Check refs, some not matched)
Armstrong, Hunter B. 1984, Jargon in Hoplology, HOPLOS
4(3):11-12.
Armstrong, Hunter B. 1986, Weapons and Systems, HOPLOS
5(1&2):26-30.
Bandura, A. 1973, Aggression: A social learning analysis.
Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Bandura, A. 1977, Self efficacy: toward a unifying theory of
behavioral change. Psychol. Review, 84:191-215
Berger, Bonnie G. and David R. Owen 1988, Stress Reduction
and Mood Enhancement in Four Exercise Modes: Swimming,
Body Conditioning, Hatha Yoga and Fencing. Research
Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 59:148-159.
Boulton, Michael J. 1991 A Comparison of Structural and
Contextual Features of Middle School Children's Playful
and Aggressive Fighting Ethology and Sociobiology
12:112-145
Conte, J.R., C. Rosen and L. Saperstein 1986 An analysis of programs to prevent the sexual
victimization of children. Journal of Primary Prevention 6:141-155.
Donohue J.J. and Taylor, K.A. 1994. The Classification of the Fighting Arts. Journal of
Asian Martial Arts 3(4):10-37.
Draeger, Donn F. 1981, The Martial-Civil Dichotomy in Asian
Combatives Hoplos 3(1):6-9.
Duthie, R.B., L. Hope and D.G. Barker 1978, Selected
Personality Traits of Martial Artists as Measured by
the Adjective Checklist Perceptual and Motor Skills
47:71-76.
Finkenberg, Mel E. 1990, Effect of Participation in
Taekwondo on College Women's Self-concept Perceptual
and Motor Skills 71:891-894.
Frager, Robert 1969, The Psychology of the Samurai
Psychology Today, Mar. 49-53,68.
Geen, Russel G. 1990, Human Aggression Open University
Press, Milton Keynes.
Gershman, L. and J.M. Stedman 1971, Oriental Defence
Exercises as Reciprocal Inhibitors of Anxiety J. Behav.
Ther. and Exp. Psychiat. 2:117-119.
Greene, R.S., R. Sawicki and E.E. Wagner 1974, Hand Test
Correlates for Karate Students: A Preliminary
Interpretation Based on Structural Analysis Perceptual
and Motor Skills 38:692-694.
Groebel, J. and R.A. Hinde eds. 1989, Aggression and War,
Their Biological and Social Bases Cambridge Univ. Press
N.Y.
Harvey, P., R. Forehand, C. Brown, and T. Holmes 1988 The
prevention of sexual abuse: examination of the
effectiveness of a program with kindergarten-age
children Behavior Therapy 19:429-435.
Henderson, K.A. and M.D. Bialeschki 1993, Fear as a
Constraint to Active Lifestyles for Females J. of Phys.
Educat. Recreation and Dance. Jan. 44-47.
Husman, Burris F. 1955, Aggression in Boxers and Wrestlers
as Measured by Projective Techniques Research Quarterly
26:421-425.
Johnson, Warren R. and Daniel C. Hutton 1955, Effects of a
Combative Sport Upon Personality Dynamics as Measured
by a Projective Test, Research Quarterly 26:49-53.
Karl, Pierre, 1991 Animal and Human Aggression, Oxford Univ.
Press, Toronto.
Kidder, L.H., J.L. Boell and M.M. Moyer 1983, Rights
Consciousness and Victimization Prevention: Personal
Defence and Assertiveness Training, J. Social Issues,
39:155-170.
Konzak, Burt and Francois Boudreau 1984, Martial arts
training and mental health: an exercise in self help
Canada's Mental Health, Dec:2-8.
Kroll, Walter 1967, Sixteen Personality Factor Profiles of
Collegiate Wrestlers Research Quarterly 38:49-57.
Kroll, Walter and B. Robert Carlson, 1967, Discriminant
function and hierarchial grouping analysis of karate
participants' personality profiles, Research Quarterly
38:405-411.
Landers, DM, SH Boutcher and MQ Wang 1986, A
Psychobiological Study of Archery Performance Research
Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 57:236-244.
Layton, Clive 1988, The Personality of Black-belt and
Nonblack-belt Traditional Karateka Perceptual and Motor
Skills, 67:218.
Layton, Clive 1990, Anxiety in Black-belt and Nonblack-belt
Traditional Karateka Perceptual and Motor Skills,
71:905-906.
Leland-Young, J. and J. Nelson 1987 Preventing sexual
assault through the resocialization of women:
unlearning victim behavior. Women and Therapy 6:203-
210.
Lineberger, Pat 1982, A Presentation of the Martial Culture
of Japan HOPLOS 4(1):4-6
Lord, S. and Nosanchuk, T.A. 1977 On turning the other
cheek: Non Violence in Christianity and social
psychology. Peace Research 9:153-164.
Madden, M.E. 1990, Attributions of Control and Vulnerability
at the Beginning and End of a Karate Course Perceptual
and Motor Skills, 70:787-794.
McDaniel, Patricia 1993 Self-Defense Training and Women's
Fear of Crime Women's Studies Int. Forum 16:37-45.
Min, Ken 1979, Martial Arts in the American Educational
Setting Quest 31:97-106.
Nosanchuk, T.A. 1981, The Way of the Warrior: The Effects of
Traditional Martial Arts Training on Aggressiveness,
Human Relations 34:435-444.
Nosanchuk, T.A. and M.L.C. MacNeil 1989, Examination of the
Effects of Traditional and Modern Martial Arts Training
on Aggressiveness Aggressive Behavior 15:153-159.
Ozer, EM and A. Bandura 1990, Mechanisms Governing
Empowerment Effects: A Self-Efficacy Analysis. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology 58:427-486.
Pellis, S.M. 1993 Book Review: Aggression and Peacefulness
in Humans and Other Primates, Aggressive Behavior,
19:241-243.
Pyecha, John 1970, Comparative effects of judo and selected
physical education activities on male university
freshmen personality traits Research Quarterly, 41:425-
431.
Richman, C.L. and H. Rehberg, The Development of Self-esteem
Through the Martial Arts Int. J. Sports Psychol.
17:234-239.
Rothpearl, Allen 1980, Personality Traits in Martial
Artists: a Descriptive Approach. Perceptual and Motor
Skills, 50:395-401.
Seabourne, T.G., R.S. Weinberg, A. Jackson and S.M. Suinn,
1985, Effect of Individualized, Nonindividualized, and
Package Intervention Strategies on Karate Performance,
Journal of Sport Psychology 7:40-50.
Seitz, F.C., G.D. Olson, B. Locke and R. Quam. 1990 The
martial Arts and Mental Health: The Challenge of
Managing Energy, Perceptual and Motor Skills 70:459-
464.
Sigurdson, E., M. Strang and T. Doig 1987 What do children
know about preventing sexual assault? How can their
awareness be increased? Can. J. Psychiatry 32:551-557.
Silverberg, J. and J.P. Gray eds. 1991 Aggression and
Peacefulness in Humans and Other Primates, Oxford Univ.
Press, Oxford.
Skelton D.L., M.A. Glynn and S.M. Berta 1991, Aggressive
Behavior as a Function of Taekwondo Ranking, Perceptual
and Motor Skills 72:179-182.
Takuan Soho (William S. Wilson trans.), 1988 THE UNFETTERED MIND
Kodansha, Tokyo.
Taylor, K. A. 1992, Resisting Sexual Assault: A manual of
resistance stratagies for escaping a sexual assault,
Seidokai publications, 44 Inkerman St. Guelph, Ont.
Canada.
Trulson, M.E. 1986 Martial arts training: A novel "cure" for
Juvenile Delinquency Human Relations 39:1131-1140.
Trulson, M.E. and C.W. Kim 1985 That mild mannered Bruce Lee
Psychology Today, January.
Warren, RJ and DC Hutton 1955, Effects of a Combative Sport
upon Personality Dynamics as Measured by a Projection
Test, Research Quarterly 26:49-53.
Williams, JM, BJ Hoepner, DL Moody, and BC Ogilvie, 1970,
Personality Traits of Champion Level Female Fencers,
Research Quarterly 41:446-453.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to thank Dr. Donna Winslow of the University of
Ottawa for her valuable discussion and contributions to this
paper.